Hello Jindrich, On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Jindrich Makovicka wrote:
> On 1/23/06, Pavel Tsekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So now to the patch - first I'd like to comment the last hunk of your patch: > > > > > - n_read_total, ctx->progress_bytes); > > > + n_read_total + ctx->do_reget, ctx->progress_bytes); > > > > > - file_progress_show (ctx, n_read_total, file_size); > > > + file_progress_show (ctx, n_read_total + ctx->do_reget, > > > file_size); > > > > I think it would be better if you substract 'ctx->do_reget' from the last > > argument (the total) instead of adding it to the second argument (the number > > of bytes read so far). This way the user won't see the progress bar > > semi-filled right after the start of the copy operation . What do you think > > ? > > I chose this variant intentionally, as it is common eg. in the > download managers - the user can immediately see that the download > operation actually resumes, and it does not start from the very > beginning. I've just commited this part of the patch. _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel