> On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 21:57 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > doesn't this cause a memory leak? Or is that memory freed > > elsewhere? > > Last statement in the skipped edit_free_syntax_rules() is a > syntax_g_free(edit->rules). I guess we need a free.
You guess .. I guess you should stop guessing and start reading code . > The zeroing by g_malloc0 only obscures possible code issues so I'd vote > against it. Yeah ? And your patch does not obfuscate the matter even more by "fixing" the problem in a place which has nothing to do with this matter ? -- Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*! "Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel