Hi, On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 15:33 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:24 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 17:22 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Jindrich Novy пишет: > > > My $0.02 to specfile highliting. > > > The mc shipped with FC4 doesn't handle correctly the case-insensivity > > > tags. For example, BuildArch and Buildarch are highliting differently, > > > but rpm recognize both. > > > Here's the patch to fix it. Thanks for pointing this out. > > Andy's examples were just that: Examples. A complete patch should allow > any mixing of case for any spec keyword. For _example_: > > \{Gg\}\{Rr\}\{Oo\}\{Uu\}\{Pp\} > > Just fixing and committing a few arbitrary examples does not makes much > sense imo.
This is a joke, isn't it? Just imagine a nice spec like this: SuMmArY: Programs for backing up and restoring ext2/ext3 filesystems nAMe: dump veRSioN: 0.4b41 I really think that the highlighting rules for spec should be limited to some set of commonly used tags. At least the first capital letter should be mandatory upper-case and some case sensitivity fix-ups should be made for tags composed from multiple words as Andy pointed out. Otherwise specs written using mcedit would be a big mess IMO. Jindrich _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel