Hello Andrew, On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 12:04 +0000, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote: > Follow-up Comment #3, bug #18042 (project mc): > > > Do I understand correctly that a port number *can* be combined with C _or_ > r?
> No. Look at utilvfs.c:vfs_split_url(). > No one syntax change. Only undocumented behaviour changed. > It is possible to use /#sh:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6789 right now. Maybe we should introduce a syntax change, because at least the combination of a port number and C are very welcome. What about a solution whereby the user can add any of these options, in any particular order, all separated by colons? Would that be a lot of work to implement? > And fish uses port&1 as 'C' option and port&2 as 'r'. > > Possible solution is to use 0x10000<<1 and 0x10000<<2 instead of 1 and 2. That would probably get rid of the need for an extra parameter to separate the port number from other options. > I am not sure we can allow such redesign because of lack of manpower. Do I understand correctly that you are not willing to implement such a change? Can we at least agree on a new syntax if somebody (I?) would be willing to implement it? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel