-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Slava Zanko <slavaza...@gmail.com> schrieb: > > Hi, > >>> huh, I'm not sure whether mvc fits in here. >> mcvfs - VIEW; core (signal handling, User events etc) - CONTROLLER, >> slang,mcslang,ncurses - VIEWs.. Why not? :) > > you meant: mcvfs = model ? No. model = any data source. mcvfs - one of sources for mc. I think, it is very early to discuss. We need to start their work, rather than drown in the discussions. :)
>>> Well, if we say "everything's a file" and the model is the vfs >>> (including things like search results represented as filesystem), >>> we could make some steps in this direction :) >> Yep, everything is a file. Network connects - files too. :) > > yeah, even sockets: > cat tcp://somehost:port/ > (I'll add this to libmvfs in the next days ...) Cool. I'm waiting now this patch. :) > >> For example: >> $ cat ~/secret/path/to/my-one-of-many-many-server.mcvfs-ftp >> host: xxx.xxx.xx >> port: 12345 >> user: xxxx >> passwd: xxxx >> passv: 1 >> ... >> >> By pressing 'Enter' to the *.mcvfs-ftp file (via mc.ext) ftp session >> will establish... Is this bad think? > > hmm, you suggest something like we know as "desktop shortcuts" from May be yes, shorcuts... > certain certain DE's ? Well, perhaps it would be even better to just > directly support well-known DE's shortcut files ? But if file will open by DE, mc don't handle data from 'shorcut'. If mc open 'shotcut' itself, then for example, pressing 'Enter' on *.mcvfs-ftp will display in active panel of mc content of remote ftp-server ('cat *.mcvfs-ftp' may be display content too ;) ) Treat all 'shorcuts' makes no sense - it's set up through mc.ext if needed. I am talking about support in the file mc.ext like this, for example: shell/.mcvfs-ftp Open=mcvfs:ftp shell/.mcvfs-dav Open=mcvfs:dav shell/.mcvfs-ssh Open=mcvfs:ssh Or simular. But it is very early to discuss too, IMHO. We can dream now, but a little... ;) > <snip> >> "some bash support fixups" >> (http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2008-December/msg00062.html) >> Patch already applied, but not in official branch - in our mc-4.6.3 :) >> Patches from our branch will transfer to an oficial branch. > What happened to 4.6.2 ? There mc-4.6.3 - is a invalid version (Russian fork). As right, we had to change name (mc+, for example). Sorry. :( >> BTW, after applying all gathehing patches, we can assign version >> 4.7.0-pre1 ;) >> Because a lot of changes compared to the current 4.6.2-pre1... > hmm, what major changes do you have in mind ? First, may will be add UTF-8 support; may will be apply other patches, stabilized in various distributions. Second, there mc-4.6.3... people will be at a loss :( WBR, Slavaz. P.S. To all: With the passing Christmas :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJWNYnb3oGR6aVLpoRAkYbAJ9x9fXYQNjdJqk7ZzgbvPSKKL3cIACfcHEh mJ4Y9JQvD7ZImKp1Jw3Tg3g= =OHVX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel