* Pavel Roskin <pro...@gnu.org> schrieb: Hi,
> >I really don't see the problem. > > The problem is that the mirror already existed on that site. Now we > have two mirrors. It's confusing to the users. Some may be tracking > my mirror now. Instead of giving you control over the existing > mirror, I'll need to ask the site administration to remove my mirror. > The users will have to switch to your repository. Why do you have to close your mirror ? I dont see any reason. Thousands of OSS projects get mirrored all around the world, even without explicit knowledge of the devs, and - as far as I know - nobody feels pissed about that. What's the problem ? > I believe it's important that the project developers act as a team > and coordinate their actions. What is there to coordinate on just some dumb unofficial mirror ? > I realize I'm not a team member anymore, but I've been maintaining > the mirror for along time. Wait, you really feel kicked-away, just because your mirror isn't the only one anyomore ? Quite strange, IMHO. > I spent quite a lot of time mapping CVS authors to the real names, > and that mapping is used in your repository. Right, and you did a great job. You volunteered to do an dirty, but important job, nobody else was willing to do. And I don't think anyone here won't appreciate that. So you *are* a valueable member of the team, and I don't see how some additional, uninteresting git mirror can change that fact. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel