On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 03:02 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > This wastes your time. Maybe it makes sense to allow > trivial fixes to be applied without going through > this process?
What are your suggestions on how would you track what, from where and WHY gets into master, who reviewed the code before submission and checked that it builds / does not introduce regressions then? I agree that it takes time, but it does not *waste* time, because afterward it makes much easier to figure out how and when a particular regression or bug was introduced. You think that your patch is trivial, but we have a record of one-liners introducing very weird and hard to find regressions. Sometimes it takes hours of bisecting to figure out what broke a particular feature... Therefore, if you want to spare us some time, you are asked to create a ticket in the tracker and attach your patches there, so that we won't have to do it for you. -- Sincerely yours, Yury V. Zaytsev _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel