Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > This looks interesting. Am I correct that this is only a framework for > build tests for different combinations of build options (builds / > doesn't build) and doesn't have anything to do with functional tests > (e.g. works / doesn't work)?
Right. Actually it's just a bunch of scripts which do tests builds. > As you might already know, I'm building nightlies for all currently > supported RH distros (with the exception of EL3) for almost half a > year. Great. What configurations do you use ? Perhaps you could add them to the testfarm ? > This has proved to be of great help, but now that I spared some money > for new hardware I might consider doing the same for Debian / Ubuntu and > running some kind of functional / build testsuite on a daily basis with > the results published on the web / mailed to the list in case of > failures. Yep, that was my idea for the next step: some build-results list where the bots post their results. or perhaps even create tickets (in an own category, so they dont mix up with the regular ones ;-o) > It would be nice if we could introduce some officially supported testing > framework in /contrib to check for most prominent bugs / general build > options coverage etc. Yep, that's a good idea. I've just created a new ticket for it: http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/1891 Maybe we should also have a closer look at tinderbox or xenofarm. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: i...@metux.de skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel