On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:47:30 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > 1775_mvfs_9P > > 1775_mvfs_9P_2 > > 1775_mvfs_9P_3 > > DEV_mvfs_fish > > DEV_mvfs_local > > METUX.mvfs > > Work in progress. I'll assign it to proper ticket when it passed > test cycles.
Do you really need these tons of branches for one task? > > MC dev team doesn't have any plans to use this unknown library. > > Did you do any one vote on that or do you now rule alone here ? We discussed about that in Jabber room and in this list. > > Please remove that branches yourself and please don't push any > > mvfs-related code to the mc repo. Else your write access to the > > mc repo will be disabled. > > Are you sure you're officially authorized to impose those threats ? I'm one of current MC developers. > Did you check back with the guy who sponsors the infrastructure ? Are you one of that sponsors? > And do you think this is an appropriate reward for one of the > people who practically revived mc from death ? And who are that people? > > If you develop the mc fork, please don't that in official mc server. > > In case you still didn't notice: the mvfs stuff was meant for > upstream on day one. Really? -- Andrew _______________________________________________ mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel