Hello, Rich!
> > Another question - what are you fixing? Is it related to FiSH is any way?
I'm sorry for the tone of the previous message. I assumed that you were
talking about something unrelated.
> The basic reason that fish is not reliable - the patch is attached.
I don't like ignoring all errors by redirecting the output to /dev/null,
unless you convince me that this is the best what MC can do.
I understand that your patch introduces some kind of logging. Could you
please explain what you are doing. Not everybody in this list has the
magic ability to read you thoughts :-)
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
