* Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is wrong with keeping 4.5.52 as "stable" release with both mc and > gmc, plus starting 5.0 "development" branch with gmc stripped? Nothing, you should do so. > PS: I believe right approach for gmc is rm -rf and starting ^^^^^^ YES ... > over. Gnome edition should do stuff like threading etc... Which means > libvfs is unusable for it and gnome-vfs [however bad] is the only way > to go. Regards, TR
- On the future of MC. Miguel de Icaza
- Re: On the future of ... Pavel Machek
- Re: On the future... Tino Reichardt
- Re: On the future... Pavel Roskin
- Re: On the fu... Walery Studennikov
- Re: On the future of ... Pavel Roskin
- Re: On the future of ... =?unknown-8bit?b?RnLpZOlyaWMgTC4gVy4=?= Meunier