Hello!

> I know.  So I wrote `temporarily'.  It is very inconvenient to change
> the field just for displaying atime or ctime once.

Once again I'm punished for trying to process the remaining e-mail faster
than usually.  Sorry, I missed your point completely.

I agree that it's inconvenient, but it's still a kludge.  To do it
properly, we would need another format specifier (let's call it "time")
that would be whatever time is used to sort files or mtime if the files
are sorted not by time.

I think it's too complicated to implement now.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
_______________________________________________
Mc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc

Reply via email to