I did not claim that mc was getting much slower. It has to depend on a slowing OS.
Nor do I need to waste resources continually up-dating mc, since I'm confident that it's mature and quite stable. BTW this gmailer is crap, except for reducing spam. == Chris Glur. On 1/2/08, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 14:49 +0300, chris glur wrote: > > Because 'the software gets slower, faster than the hardware > > gets faster', I've gone 'back' to an older linux installation > > which uses mc ver. 4.5.55. > > I was the maintainer between versions 4.5.55 and 4.6.0, and there was > very little new code added at that time. In fact, I was mostly removing > or simplifying code. > > I really doubt that 4.6.0 is noticeably slower that 4.5.55 if compiled > under the same conditions. > > > The newer/slower linux has ver. 4.6.0, > > which has the nice facility of 'copying the selected fileID to > > the command line, by <Ctrl-enter>'. > > > > I now see that this facility works in VT-mode but not with X/KDE. > > Do I need some setup in mc, or must I investigate KDE ? > > Support for more terminals was indeed an exception, when some code was > added. > > I would prefer that you stop mistrusting mc developers and use the > latest version. But it's your choice. You can spend days configuring > KDE as much as you want. Just make sure you are using an old version, > so that your results are useless for other users. > > > Also, do some users have success with 'undelete' ? > > And for which fs-types: ext2, ext3, reiser ? > > Yes, only with ext2. > > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin > _______________________________________________ Mc mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
