* Yury V. Zaytsev <y...@shurup.com> wrote: Hi folks,
<big_snip /> Debian seems to have a long history of patching-to-death a lot of packages - but other distros are even worse (look @SuSE) ;-P I wish some distro maintainers would work more closely to upstream. Perhaps we should encourage them to have their own branches in our git repo. Why not giving every distro an own branch prefix ? (doesnt necessarily mean giving everybody write access to upstream branches). IMHO that would make things a lot easier. > It's not debian-haters@ or ubuntu-support@ or whatever... Official address for debian-haters is gentoo-...@lists.gentoo.org ;-) > It's a users list for mc and we mostly care about the stock > upstream versions and not distro-specific packages. ACK. But it's IMHO not a bad thing to get some feedback for distro specific things here. At least we should know what's happening to mc in certain distros (doesn't mean we're responsible in any ways). cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Mc mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
