On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 09:03 +1200, William Kimber wrote: > On Saturday 23 April 2011 22:57:28 you wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 09:57 +1200, William Kimber wrote: > > > Also when fish is buffering and copying it is at about a tenth or > > > less of the speed that the network runs at. > > > > What do you mean by "at about tenth ..."? Are you including the > > buffering stage in the calculation? > > Yes I am including the buffering. Actually it is probably more like 50 > times slower overall rather than 10 times. It is on local 100M ethernet > connection.
Then you must be kidding me. What buffering has to do at all with your network speed? It's a constant overhead defined by your file size and local filesystem read/write speed. > It seems to not work properly if the harddrive is filled, Of course it won't work for properly if you are running out of space. > Is there any way to stop it once you have started the transfer? Not at the moment, but as far as I know Ilya was struggling to implement something like this in the development version. -- Sincerely yours, Yury V. Zaytsev _______________________________________________ mc mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
