On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:52:22 +0100 (CET) "Yury V. Zaytsev" <y...@shurup.com> wrote:
> Hi there, > > TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball on > your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the > previous 4.8.25 release: > > https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.25-154-g33c84e75e.tar.xz > > $ sha256sum mc-4.8.25-154-g33c84e75e.tar.xz > ce5f965a9be603098eda65afd1aa149e285d903fe303fe907c6a5e88f28dd772 > mc-4.8.25-154-g33c84e75e.tar.xz > > I've built this tarball out of the latest master with translations from > Transifex pulled in on a fresh Fedora 33 VM, which I'm also going to use > to build the final release in about a week from now if nothing serious > comes up. Is there an option to tag release candidates just like releases and name/upload tarballs into expected locations just like releases? That would make pulling release candidates (at least) into Gentoo an almost automatic action. Otherwise I'm always spending some time to name candidate as 4.8.26_rc1 (or 4.8.25_p154, or something else) downstream to the point I decide not to package candidates to avoid user confusion. -- Sergei
pgp_bCLcC3LpZ.pgp
Description: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ mc mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
