I just came across this datapoint for comparative figures for detected and connected Wi-Fi numbers against actual visitor numbers. The article is over six months old and the data is almost two years old, but would seem to suggest that you have twice as many visitors as you are detecting on your Wi-Fi network, and about 10 times as many as your connected numbers.
http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2017/04/exclusive-heres-what-museums-learn-by-tracking-your-phone/ <http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2017/04/exclusive-heres-what-museums-learn-by-tracking-your-phone/> Mapping this to my situation in Balboa Park, it seems within the realms of possibility. What would have changed in two years? More people with a Wi-Fi enabled device would mean a lower ratio? Other thoughts? Does anyone have any similar comparative data? -nik ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nik Honeysett | Chief Executive Officer | BPOC | www.bpoc.org M (805) 402-3326 P (619) 331-1974 E nhoneys...@bpoc.org <mailto:nhoneys...@bpoc.org> 1549 El Prado, Suite 8, San Diego, CA 92101 A technology collaboration that connects audiences to art, culture and science. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer Network (http://www.mcn.edu) To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l@mcn.edu To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit: http://mcn.edu/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l The MCN-L archives can be found at: http://www.mail-archive.com/mcn-l@mcn.edu/
