> > > Depends. Are they free, or do I need a credit card number. In the latter case,
> > > could you also mail me Ingos credit card details? ;-)
> >
> > No problem, but his visa statement suggests he already exceeded
> > his credit limit.
>
> No wonder, "he" registered some thousand copies of vapor products
> today, eh Olli? ;-))
I registered MD II exactly 250 times according to my credit card
statement an thus trying to enter porn sites with this card is no
longer possible. I have the idea that next month "I" will get in the
mood of registering further great vapor products :-)
> To get on topic again, let me repeat some of my suggestions and
> questions regarding the pgp support while you're reading anyway... ;)
>
> Those features are how I would define (nearly) perfect pgp
> integration, being realistic I don't expect them in the next few
> versions - non the less, please look at them and consider putting them
> on your todo list.
I agree to most of them while I don't understand all of your requests.
As a beginning I suggested the biggest problem for me not being able
to sign a message.
> Checking of signatures of mails doesn't seem to be supported?
Thats another thing on my wishlist.
> The handling of the messages should be more automated, ie. the
> application/pgp-encrypted attachment just containing the version
> shouldn't be displayed in the main message reader window,
Would be nice. I liked the natural way MD1 did pgp.
> Signatures should be checked automatically too (maybe another icon
> showing that the message was signed) and instead of displaying "This
> part of the message does not contain text." along with the save and
> view gadgets for the application/pgp-signature attachment, it should
> display the important lines of the pgp output in that place, ie. "Good
> signature from user ... . Signature made ... with key ...". A warning
> requester should pop up for invalid signatures, and an optional(!)
> "get required key from keyserver" requester if PGP 5.x is used and the
> key that made the signature isn't in the pubring.
Yeah, that's the way I'd like it and my main reason to upgrade to
PGP 5.x.
> Maybe the addressbook should have options to automatically sign and/or
> encrypt messages sent to the specific user.
Agreed, as that's the way MD1 did it and that's the way (aha aha) I
like it :-)
--
___________________________________________________________________________
__
\/ Hasta la vista, baby E-MAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________________________
