Hi Nathan,
The Sony MZ-R3 is a damn fine unit, mine is still working perfectly today
and if your insurance policy is a "new for old" cover then you should get a
MZ-R90 or 55 or 50 (your choice-- I'd probably go for the 50).
I love my R3, it may not be as small as todays units, and it may munch
through batteries like hell but it has never let me down :-) Nathan, check
what your policy says very carefully, given how much the R3 was when
on sale the R90 would be a bargain for them as a replacement. I think
the insurance company are trying to avoid a payout!
Cheers,
PrinceGaz -- "if it harms none, do what you will"
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://website.lineone.net/~princegaz/
ICQ: 36892193
Earn a minimum of $20 per hour by watching ads on the net!
Visit http://www.bepaid.com/users.rhtml?REFID=10164669
From: "Nathan Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey there everyone,
> Just a quick question for the mailing list. I was until recently an
> owner of a MZ-R3. As most of you know this was one of the original and
> great Minidisc recorders. I had owned it for 4 years, until some little
> prick stole my bag with it in it. Luckily I had the thing insured. So
> now my insurance company is telling me that the MZ-R3 is a sub-standard
> model. By today's standards..... yes it is. But when it came out it was
> the top of Sony's line. Am I the only one that thinks this?? I mean I
> know my minidiscs and although the MZ-R3 is old it still is a great
> model and what I would consider a classic.
> I just want to see what everyone here thinks of the situation.
> Cheers,
> Nathan Howe
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
