Agreed! I have the 940 and the E900. and they make a great couple...
Personally I couldn't hear any difference between SP and LP2. however, there
is a difference in LP4...the most obvious difference is the channel
separation.. which is not as clear as the other 2 mode.. but it's still very
good.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Small
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: Hello , I have a few questions:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:21:50 +0200, Lion Shmulevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>2) I heard that the MDLP system is not so good. I mean the sound quality in
LP-2/4, is
>it true?
Hello Lion. IMHO this is not true. I think the LP2 mode is perfectly
acceptable for mobile use. I think it's a real plus for this reason. The
LP4
mode is great for time shifting FM radio, etc. Another boon. I personally
would not purchase an MD unit without the LP feature for these reasons. I
have
to portable units, an E40 player and an R50 recorder/player. And I have a
940
deck with LP. I plan to add an R900 or similar Sharp unit (ST70?) soon. LP
is
that useful in my hands.
Of course your priorities may be different.
-jts <Arlington, TX>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
