Michael Hoffman's email seems to have hit the list like a Rorschach test, causing folks to take issue (at length!) with whatever part of the MD/MP3/PC-audio equation raises their hackles. So, please allow me my reading :-) "Michael Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well then forget MD and stay with MP3. We must engineer our own > MD-burner technology that can do it the right way -- to make MD and > possibly ATRAC a lossless bit-for-bit general file transfer and > storage medium, *fully* computer-centric just like MP3. Right! While I appreciate your bravery Michael, the sad fact is that we (the users) are not permitted to decide which features and conveniences modern audio gear will have. Not even the manufacturers can. In this day and age the decision has been given over to the RIAA and their friends in Congress. The only reason people can have so much fun with MP3s and CDs (8cm or otherwise) is that PC connectable CDs existed before the Home Recording Rights Act. Were it otherwise, CD would certainly be hobbled with SCMS (or worse), just as MD is, and DataPlay will be. Wouldn't you guess it is glaringly obvious to Sony what wonderful playtoys fully PC integrated Minidisc recorders would be, and the huge market potential they would have? But I take my reading of Sony's thinking from the NetMD announcement; the promiment aspect of it is not that MD can now be part of the PC audio scene, but rather that it will be able to satisfy the digital rights management requirements that simply everyone in the PC/Internet audio field is concerning themselves with. I think it is best to consider CD/MP3 as a wonderful grandfatherered anamoly that has (so far) managed to escape being corralled by the recording industry. As for whom to plead with for the features on your audio dream machine of the future, I suggest writing congress. Rick ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not computer-literate
Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor Sun, 05 Aug 2001 06:26:53 -0700
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Mike Lastucka
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- Re: MD: titling is a red herring David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... las
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Michael Hoffman
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... las
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Stuart Howlette
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... macdef
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Michael Hoffman
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Stuart Howlette
- RE: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's... Michael Hoffman
- Re: MD: MD inferior to MP3: it's not ... Richard Rudie