http://musliminsuffer.blogspot.com/

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful


=== News Update ===





The Central Global Threat of Violence: The Axis of Aggression, the United 
States and Israel

Torture, Death and Devastation

Edward S. Herman

August 25, 2006

Z Magazine, September 2006 - 2006-08-15


With Israel engaged once again in a major war of aggression in Lebanon, and 
protected once again from any effective global response by U.S. power and 
veto, it becomes clearer than ever that the central global problem 
of  organized violence and lawlessness in the early 21st century lies in 
the aims, collaboration and power of  the U.S.-Israeli axis. These partners 
in aggression and state terrorism reinforce one another’s projections of 
power, the out-of-control superpower protecting its regional client’s 
ultra-ethnic cleansing, while the Israeli lobby within the United States 
supports the violent projection of  power by the United States, which 
provides further cover for Israel’s escalating regional violence. What is 
most remarkable, however, is the feeble resistance to--and sometimes 
positive support of --the ATDD axis’s violence by the European countries 
and "international community" more broadly.


Free to Aggress

Consider that the United States has carried out three wars of aggression in 
violation of the UN Charter just over the last  seven years (Yugoslavia, 
Afghanistan, Iraq), and that without having digested its Iraq 
aggression--now universally recognized as having been based on lies and a 
cynical abuse of  UN processes, as well as being the "supreme crime"--it 
has actually begun a fourth aggression, against Iran, once again under the 
cynical cover of  the UN (see Edward S. Herman and David Peterson, 
"<http://www.electricpolitics.com/2006/05/the_fourth_supreme_internation.html>The
 
Fourth U.S. 'Supreme International Crime' in Seven Years Is Already 
Underway, With the Support of  the Free Press and 'International 
Community'," Counterpunch, May 11, 2006). Furthermore, the United States 
was the main driver of  the "sanctions of mass destruction" against Iraq 
throughout the 1990s which resulted in the deaths of perhaps a million 
Iraqi civilians, possibly the greatest genocide of the post-World War II 
era (with only the Congo and Rwanda serious rivals), a project also carried 
out by the cynical misuse of  the UN.

  Instead of resisting these aggressions and genocidal operations, the G-8 
and international community have appeased the aggressor and genocidist, 
never condemning its aggressions or imposing sanctions in response to its 
major crimes, but even collaborating with it, and in the case of Iraq 
giving it ex post approval and support for the deadly occupation. The UN, 
created specifically to prevent "the scourge of war," has failed to pose 
any serious constraining force on the serial aggressions by the United 
States,  or those of its Israeli client. This failure, and the global 
crisis that it reflects, has hardly been recognized in the Western media 
and intellectual circles, for the same reasons that underlie the 
appeasement and collaboration­the military power of the superpower, fear of 
the economic and political consequences of  opposition to the United 
States’ and its client’s rampaging, some sense of solidarity and support 
for U.S. and Israeli objectives and policies on the part of global elites 
and media, and cowardice and lack of moral fortitude.

Israel as well as the United States has been free over several decades to 
aggress, ignore any UN resolutions or rulings, ignore international law 
governing the behavior of an occupying power, and steadily "redeem the 
land" of Palestine by ethnically cleansing the Palestinians. It carried out 
a major invasion of Lebanon back in 1982, with no penalty for this 
aggression, no penalty for a lengthy illegal occupation, or for periodic 
Iron Fist bombing and ground attacks on Lebanon, or for its lengthy 
maintenance of  a terrorist proxy army on Lebanese soil. Its fresh major 
aggression  in Lebanon in July and August  2006 is also being carried out 
without any UN or other international penalty or sanctions, again as in 
1982 with the protection of the U.S. veto and U.S. power, and Israel is 
currently threatening Iran and Syria without any apparent U.S. or 
international community constraint.


Torture Centers

In addition to preeminence in aggression, the U.S.-Israel axis has long 
been important in sponsoring and using torture. The U.S. use of 
water-boarding goes back to the war against Philippine "niggers" in 1900; 
its use of  electronic methods of torture was extensive during the Vietnam 
war, along with "Tiger Cages;" and this country was the principal sponsor 
of regimes of  torture in the 1960s and 1970s as U.S. leaders struggled 
against nationalist-populist upheavals in the Third World. Many premier 
torturers learned their lessons in the School of the Americas in those 
years. Abu Ghraib, Bagram and the rendition gulag are not a break from the 
past or contrary to "American values," they are built on a solid tradition. 
(Chapter 2 of  Chomsky and Herman, The Washington Connection, published 
back in 1979, was entitled "The Pentagon-CIA Archipeligo.")

Israel has used torture on a systematic basis against Palestinians for 
decades, the New York Times noting matter-of-factly in 1993 that Israel's 
torture victims were running to 400-500 per month, but that Israel was 
"rethinking" the merits of its "interrogation" practices (Joel Greenberg, 
"Israel Rethinks Interrogation of Arabs," Aug. 14, 1993). If this was being 
done to Jews on a systematic basis in some country, the outcry would be 
deafening, but here also an Israeli practice condemned everywhere as 
barbaric is treated in very low key and brings about no negative policy 
responses from the United States or international community. This has 
permitted Israel to thrive, to command massive international aid, and to be 
given regular accolades as a model democracy, despite its long record of 
being "the only state in the world to effectively legalize the use of 
methods which constitute torture or ill-treatment" (Amnesty International, 
"The Israeli government should implement the High Court decision making 
torture illegal," Sept. 6, 1999).  (This statement was made prior to the 
coming into power of the "moral values" regime of  George Bush, Dick Cheney 
and Albert Gonzales.)


Killing Machines­The Killing Business is Good

The United States and Israel are also major dispensers of  death to peoples 
who stand in their way.  Both are highly militarized, the United States now 
the dominant military power on earth, Israel toweringly superior in 
military strength to any of its neighbors. Both have increasingly displayed 
the arrogance of power and a readiness to use their superior arms in lieu 
of  peaceable means of settling disputes. Both have gravitated to the use 
of high tech weaponry that has devastating effects on civilians, but which 
reduces the need for land troops and aggressor casualties. As noted, their 
violent proclivities are now mutually reinforcing.

The U.S. use of  atomic weapons against civilian populations in Hiroshima 
and Nagasaki, with hundreds of thousands of  civilian casualties in what 
was a demonstration and warning performance, stands alone in the annals of 
violence, and the United States has a long-standing tradition of 
brandishing and threatening to use these ever more lethal monstrosities. 
Israel also has a sizable nuclear weapons arsenal, and has long posed a 
threat of  first use, reinforced by the absence of  any nuclear retaliatory 
power by its nearby rivals. The Iran "threat" of acquiring nuclear weapons 
is the threat of potential self-defense, which would rob Israel of one 
important element that allows it regularly to use force against its neighbors.

During the Vietnam War, in which the United States deployed its ferocious 
weaponry lavishly against a resistant peasant society, it killed several 
million people. To this we may add hundreds of thousands killed in Cambodia 
and Laos. Many thousands have continued to die in Indochina from the 
millions of  unexploded bombs that litter the soil and that the United 
States has made no effort to clean up or even provide supportive map 
guidance or technical aid. As one sign read over a U.S. military camp in 
Vietnam, "Killing is our business, and business is good."

Much of U.S. death-dealing has been via sponsorship. It sponsored and long 
had a special relationship with the Suharto dictatorship, aiding its 
initial genocidal burst in 1965-1966 with possibly a million or more 
civilian deaths by massacre, and supporting its invasion-occupation of East 
Timor and some 200,000 further deaths there. It sponsored the rise of 
National Security States in Latin America, with death squads flourishing 
and  U.S.-trained counter-insurgency cadres establishing a state terrorism 
"infinitely worse than the terrorism they were combating" (an Argentine 
post-junta truth commission). The U.S.-sponsored wars in Central America in 
the 1970s and 1980s took a heavy civilian toll, with genocidal attacks on 
the Guatemalan Mayan Indians, among other large-scale state murder 
operations. The U.S.-sponsored killings in Latin America in those years run 
into the hundreds of thousands (the "disappeared" alone were estimated to 
be 90,000 back in 1981). The U.S. "constructive engagement" with apartheid 
South Africa and support of  "freedom fighter" Savimbi in Angola 
contributed many hundreds of thousands of  deaths in that area in the 1970s 
and 1980s.

Israel’s killings have been on a smaller scale, but still notable in light 
of  their claims of being victims of  terrorism and merely retaliating to 
the actions of  their weaker neighbors and the Palestinian resistance to 
their occupation and ethnic cleansing. Israel’s supposed "retaliation" to 
Palestinian "terrorism" featured a ratio of  Palestinian to Israeli deaths 
of  20 or 25 to 1 until the second intifada, when the ratio fell to 3 or 4 
to 1, though with a higher injury ratio (the figure of 25-1 is given by 
James Bennett in the New York Times, March 12, 2002). The killings at Sabra 
and Shatila, mainly of  women, children and old people, has been estimated 
to run between 1,500 and 3,000, which is far greater than the Israeli 
police estimate of  PLO killings of  Israelis for the entire period 
1968-1981 (282). The total of Israeli killings in Palestine are hard to 
estimate but run to tens of thousands. The Israeli killings of Lebanese in 
the 1982 invasion has been estimated at  17-20,000, and the numbers killed 
in Lebanon before and after that date surely run into many thousands.


Devastation

The United States has used its advanced weapons technology and wealth not 
only to kill large numbers in countries that stand in its way, but also to 
destroy their infrastructure and means of livelihood, thereby teaching them 
and others a lesson in the costs of opposition, setting back their capacity 
for development, and taking vengeance. Vietnam’s forests were bulldozed and 
destroyed by chemical warfare, its lands were widely ruined by chemicals 
and millions of  bomb craters, a large fraction of  its most competent and 
productive males were killed, mainly in bomb strikes, vast numbers were 
wounded and traumatized and hundreds of thousands of  children suffered 
birth deformities by chemical poisoning. Vietnam could no longer pose a 
threat of  a working alternative model. Neither could Nicaragua pose a 
"threat of a good example" after a decade of  U.S.-sponsored terrorist and 
economic warfare that reduced incomes by half and played a key role in 
ousting the reformist Sandinista government. El Salvador, Guatemala, the 
Dominican Republic, Haiti, Afghanistan, the Congo and  Angola are other 
states that have not recovered from U.S. direct or sponsored attacks.

Iraq was devastated in the Persian Gulf War of 1990-1991 and was then not 
permitted to recover, even to restore its badly damaged water and sanitary 
facilities, let alone to feed its people. The 2003-2006 invasion-occupation 
took a further heavy toll of  Iraq’s already devastated infrastructure, and 
was also notable for the invader’s severe damage done or permitted to be 
done to Iraq’s libraries, museums, and other important historical 
monuments. Iraq is a shattered society, with serial blows administered by 
the United States and mainly Britain, with UN connivance.

Israel ravaged Lebanon time and again from 1978 onward, with exceptionally 
heavy destruction of infrastructure in 1982 and now again in 2006. In 2002 
Israel began a systematic destruction of  the infrastructure of  Palestine, 
destroying public buildings, records, medical facilities, libraries, among 
other facilities. In its recent 2006 assault on Gaza, nominally to help 
free a single captive Israeli soldier, its first target was the electric 
power station that serves 700,000 Palestinian civilians. Further targets 
included rooftop water tanks and mains, bridges, roads and medical 
facilities.  At no time has Israel been penalized or punished by the EU, 
let alone its patron superpower, for these multiple open, blatant and 
illegal attacks on civilian facilities.


Conclusion

This is an age of  escalating violence, led by a militarized superpower 
with an enormous capacity to kill, closely linked with an expansionist and 
militarized client that sees benefits to its "Greater Israel" and ethnic 
cleansing program in chaos and warfare. This is a continuation 
of  long-standing policies of this Axis of  ATDD, but rendered more 
dangerous by the death of  the Soviet Union (and the ending of  real 
"containment") and the coming to power in the United States of an 
exceptionally irresponsible, stupid  and weak administration. The weak, 
stupid and amoral frequently do stupid and horrendous things to compensate 
for their mistakes, and once again in the Middle East they have unleashed 
large-scale violence and the threat of  an even wider war..

The  Axis of ATDD is setting the tone across the globe. It preaches that 
those resisting it only understand force, but the world recognizes that 
this is straight out of Orwell and that in truth it is the axis duo that 
only responds to force or its threat. Thus the Axis leadership provokes a 
responsive militarization and violence across the globe, and the huge 
problems facing the peoples of  the world (poverty, disease, environmental 
threats, inequality, racism, democratic deficits) are unaddressed and 
become steadily more serious.

These problems are not going to be dealt with until the world’s publics 
become sufficiently aroused to throw out the rascally leaderships of the 
Axis and/or to force the non-Axis powers to resist Axis violence with 
actions that bite and cannot be ignored.

source:
http://www.uruknet.com/?p=m26086&hd=0&size=1&l=e

===


-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Ajaklah teman dan saudara anda bergabung ke milis Media Dakwah.
Kirim email ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/media-dakwah/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke