quote:"Yet, what Muslims should also need to consider is who can guarantee 
security in Iraq following the withdrawal of U.S. and allied forces, given 
Shiite-Sunni strife existed long before the U.S. invasion." unquote
   
  amartien:  Betul sekali.  Ini dimulai jauh sebelum adanya negara Amrik.  
Karballa massacre 680served.
   
  quote: "It is also hard to deny the reality that when Saddam Hussein was in 
power, the Shiites in Iraq were badly treated by the Sunnis. Nevertheless, 
while the arrival of U.S. troops succeeded in toppling the dictator Saddam 
Hussein, the invasion has increased the misery of the Iraqi people and been 
widely criticized by the world community, as well as in the U.S. itself.: 
unquote
   
  amartien:  Hmmm .......  "misery Iraqi people" tsb. siapakah penyebabnya?  
Kita lihat saja di website Iraq body count bahwa itu adalah muslim membunuh 
muslimin.  Penulis lupa kali membaca berita2 mengenai pemboman2, bom2 bunuh 
diri, penculikan2, penggorokan 2 leher, dll. yang terjadi setiap hari di Irak, 
dilakukan oleh orang2 Islam terhadap sesama Islam.
   
  

Sunny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
              
http://www.thejakartapost.com/detaileditorial.asp?fileid=20070420.F05&irec=3
   
   
  Don't blame those who don't trust Muslims   Mohammad Yazid, Jakarta
   
  In a bid to enhance his understanding of Islam, my parents allowed my younger 
brother to participate in Koranic recitation and discussion sessions. After a 
few months, he began to make positive changes such as performing regular 
evening prayers, and zikir (chanting verses in praise of Allah), which he had 
rarely done before.
  However, about a year later, he started to demonstrate a different attitude. 
He began to argue about the interpretation of the Koranic verses and hadiths 
(words and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad), also with my parents. He actively 
encouraged his friends to join his group's recitations, frequently neglecting 
the small business he had been developing for some years after high school.   
As a result of my brother's peculiar take on Islamic teachings, such as his 
refusal to perform obligatory prayers and Ramadhan fasting rituals by asserting 
that "the right time has not yet come", my father, a Muhammadiyah follower, 
found it difficult to accept my brother's attitude, although he tried hard to 
understand.   Most regrettably, though, my brother grew intolerant of other 
people's views after almost two years attending the recitation group, without 
ever telling us who his teacher was or describing what the group got up to. 
Without any hesitation, he branded those not sharing his
 opinions as infidels. His closed viewpoint and exclusive beliefs also created 
tension within the family. He finally decided to leave home without saying 
anything, and closed up his business. By this stage, he was even refusing to 
see family members.   "Why have his religious studies led to a family rift and 
his increased religious knowledge resulted in hatred?" was what I found myself 
asking.   There is a fundamental difference between studying the right way to 
embrace a religion and the science of religion.   The former aims at 
understanding the universal belief in God so that life can be approached with 
wisdom, which is helped by the support of religious science. The process 
involves personal and spiritual experiences of life. The outcome of this is a 
proper comprehension of the correct balance between hablum minalloh (the 
vertical relationship with God) and hablum minannas (horizontal relationships 
between human beings).   The latter involves the study of religious
 teachings as written in the Koran and hadiths, which may give rise to 
conflicting interpretations against the backdrop of diverse levels of 
knowledge. It adopts a doctrinal system so that tension often arises along with 
different views as each interpreter claims to have discovered the exclusive 
truth.   Amid high unemployment and difficulties in making a decent living due 
to the country's difficult economic situation and the low-quality of its human 
resources, conflict arising from religious issues can very easily trigger 
anarchy and intolerance.   What happened to my brother and the attack on a 
Shiite group using sickles and cudgels in Sampang regency, Madura, on April 9 
are examples of this type of intolerance.   No bloodshed occurred in Sampang as 
the police had taken precautions to avoid a full-scale clash. But the incident, 
of course, contradicts the spirit of Muslim brotherhood.   In Indonesia, 
intolerance toward fellow Muslims has frequently surfaced. Large numbers
 of Ahmadiyah followers around the country have been subjected to anarchic 
treatment by those adhering to other Islamic schools. Most notably, some 10,000 
members of the Indonesian Muslim Solidarity Group assaulted the Ahmadiyah 
Indonesia Congregation (JAI) compound, the Mubarak campus, in Bogor, West Java, 
in 2005.   Approaches and actions that tarnish the image of Islam undoubtedly 
reduce the confidence of non-Muslims when it comes to interfaith relations. 
They also indicate that Muslims are unable to draw lessons from the examples 
set by the Prophet Muhammad, who was able to live peacefully and amicably under 
the same roof with his uncle Abi Talib, who embraced a different faith.   The 
same is true of the internal conflict in Islam between the Shiite and Sunni 
communities currently taking place in Iraq in the wake of the fall of Iraqi 
president Saddam Hussein four years ago, when the U.S. and its allies launched 
a military attack on that country.   Many fence-mending
 attempts have been made to end the conflict, which has killed 37,000 people 
and left 471,000 others homeless. One of these was the meeting of Islamic 
leaders to discuss Iraqi reconciliation at the Bogor Palace on April 3-4, which 
recommended the withdrawal of U.S. and allied troops, among other things.   As 
a peace-seeking effort, this recommendation merits consideration as an 
alternative solution. Yet, what Muslims should also need to consider is who can 
guarantee security in Iraq following the withdrawal of U.S. and allied forces, 
given Shiite-Sunni strife existed long before the U.S. invasion.   It is also 
hard to deny the reality that when Saddam Hussein was in power, the Shiites in 
Iraq were badly treated by the Sunnis. Nevertheless, while the arrival of U.S. 
troops succeeded in toppling the dictator Saddam Hussein, the invasion has 
increased the misery of the Iraqi people and been widely criticized by the 
world community, as well as in the U.S. itself.   Many Islamic
 figures maintain that the conflict in Iraq is not due to Shiite-Sunni rivalry, 
as shown by several countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Lebanon, 
where both groups are said to live in peace. However, Iraqi history shows that 
the Shiite-Sunni feud is deep-rooted, reaching its climax with the death of 
Imam Hussein, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, when he fought against the 
Sunni Muslims in the seventh century in what is now Karbala, Iraq. To be 
honest, Shiite followers still find it hard to forget the death of Imam 
Hussein, who is commemorated on Asyura day, Muharam 9-10.   The writer is a 
staff member of The Jakarta Post. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]   .   
  printer friendly send to a friend -->


  

         

Kirim email ke