January 29, 2010

For Apple, iPad Said More Than Intended
By BRAD STONE
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/technology/29name.html?ref=technology&pagewanted=print


SAN FRANCISCO — Apple has generated a lot of chatter with its new iPad 
tablet. But it may not be quite the conversation it wanted.

Many women are saying the name evokes awkward associations with feminine 
hygiene products. People from Boston to Ireland are complaining that 
“iPad,” in their regional brogue, sounds almost indistinguishable from 
“iPod,” Apple’s music player.

Then there are more serious conflicts. Two other high-tech companies 
already market products called iPad and are laying claim to the trademark.

In the hours after the iPad announcement on Wednesday, “iTampon” became 
one of the most popular trending topics on Twitter. Apple’s 
communication team fielded a wave of queries on the subject but 
characteristically declined to comment.

“I care about words and their connotations, but you don’t have to be in 
junior high to make this leap,” said Robin Bernstein, a corporate speech 
writer on Long Island, who addressed the issue on her Facebook page on 
Wednesday. “A lot of women when they hear the word ‘pad’ are going to 
think about feminine hygiene.”

Michael Cronan, a naming consultant in Berkeley, Calif., whose company 
has helped come up with brands like TiVo and Kindle, said many naming 
experiments show that women tend to reflexively relate words like “pad” 
and “flow” to bodily concerns.

He is not sure Apple could have found an alternative that ties in as 
perfectly to its famous brands. “I think we’re going to get over this 
fairly quickly and we’ll get on with enjoying the experience.”

But the folks at Fujitsu, the Japanese technology firm, may not be quite 
so eager to forgive and forget. The company has applied for the iPad 
trademark in the United States and already sells an iPad — a $2,000 
hand-held device that shop clerks use to check inventory.

STMicroelectronics, the Swiss semiconductor company, owns the iPad 
trademark in Europe and uses it as an acronym for integrated passive and 
active devices — which sounds less fun than playing games on a tablet. 
(A third company, MagTek of Seal Beach, Calif., makes a portable 
magnetic card reader of the same name.)

These kinds of naming conflicts have not stopped Apple before. In 2007, 
on the eve of the introduction of the iPhone, the technology giant Cisco 
Systems pointed out that it already sold an Internet handset called the 
iPhone. Steven P. Jobs, Apple’s chief executive, led the negotiation for 
the name, peppering Cisco executives with calls at all hours, and 
telling them he was prepared to claim that Cisco was underutilizing the 
trademark.

Mr. Jobs finally persuaded Cisco to surrender the trademark with a vague 
promise to market their products jointly — a partnership that never 
materialized.

“He’s a very tough businessman and tough negotiator,” said Charles 
Giancarlo, a former Cisco executive who dealt directly with Mr. Jobs on 
the issue. “I feel sorry for the poor guy at Fujitsu who is going to be 
negotiating with Steve directly.”

-- 
================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
Mail: antunes at uh dot edu

***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to