The Intimate Social Graph

How private are the most private communications you have on social 
networking sites?

by Keith Dawson
October 14, 2010

For a number of years I have had a privacy concern that is just now 
beginning to peep into view on the Internet at large. Around 2001 I 
spent some time in a casual multiuser game hosted by PopCap. It 
featured a way that two players could chat in a private space while 
playing the game. The game was centrally hosted: each user's local 
Java applet talked with a PopCap server, so every keystroke typed in 
those private conversations was sent up to the server and back out to 
the other party's client. I wondered at the time: were those 
conversations being stored? How about the metadata describing which 
players talked privately with which others, and how often? If so, 
then from what I observed, the resulting log files could have kept an 
army of divorce lawyers gainfully employed for years to come.

Fast-forward to 2010. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and MySpace each 
sit on a rapidly expanding treasure-trove of data about the users who 
frequent their services. Aspects of this data have value to different 
audiences. Knowledge of users' interests, likes, and enthusiasms 
clearly is coveted for targeting advertising. Knowledge of the users' 
"social graphs" -- who connects to whom and in what manner of 
relationship -- may be of interest to social science researchers, and 
occasionally to law enforcement. But what of the "intimate social 
graph?" All these services allow users to communicate privately with 
one another. The social networking services store not only the graph 
metadata (who communicates with whom and when), but also the content 
of these private communications. What happens when government agents 
-- or divorce lawyers -- come calling?

...

http://www.itworld.com/legal/124032/the-intimate-social-graph

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
Medianews@etskywarn.net
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to