http://mashable.com/2012/11/27/curiosity-rover-discovery-npr/

When Curiosity chief scientist John Grotzinger sat down with NPR on Nov.
13, it was to discuss the rover's mission on Mars. But when the
interview aired last week, it was just one quote on soil samples that
made headlines: "This data is gonna be one for the history books."

It didn't take long for Twitter, Facebook and even other news
organizations to pick up the quote. Similar to a childhood game of
"Telephone," that statement ballooned into one of the week's biggest
stories: After just a few months on Mars, the Curiosity rover had made,
in the NPR reporter's words, an "earth-shaking" discovery. One so big
that NASA had to quadruple-check the results. 

That rumor, however, isn't exactly accurate. 

The quote heard around the world came shortly after Grotzinger explained
that NASA had just received the initial data from Curiosity's first soil
experiment using a new Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) instrument, which
is capable of identifying organic compounds. 

Naturally, the public assumed that this meant Curiosity had discovered a
complex organic molecule. But while NASA does have the latest soil
samples, the mission team tells Mashable that researchers haven't
determined that particular groundbreaking discovery. In fact the rover
drove away from the location just five days later, taking more samples
along the way.

What Grotzinger was actually trying to convey is that Curiosity's data
over her entire two-year mission will further our knowledge of Mars more
than ever before, making it a historical mission. This is entirely
factual. In her short time on the Red Planet, Curiosity has already made
significant discoveries - like finding an ancient streambed where water
once flowed. More recently, she determined that astronauts could survive
Mars radiation levels.

As for Grotzinger's comment about checking and re-checking the data
before releasing it to the public, that's just standard scientific
procedure. This is especially true when it's the first set of data from
a new instrument. 

NASA Social Media Manager Veronica McGregor, who is part of the
three-woman team that manages Curiosity's social media, says the rover's
Nov. 21 tweet was an effort to clear up the misunderstanding: 
What did I discover on Mars? That rumors spread fast online. My team
considers this whole mission "one for the history books"
- Curiosity Rover (@MarsCuriosity) November 21, 2012

"It's always difficult to quell rumors like this one," McGregor says.
"But at the same time it's great to see so many people are excited and
interested in what the rover might find." 

No one is saying there isn't a major discovery in Curiosity's future. It
just hasn't happened yet. 

If and when that does happen, it's important to note that NASA wouldn't
announce a major discovery on a news network. In fact, the agency only
makes major announcements via press conferences at its headquarters. 

According McGregor, the agency does have a press conference slated for
Dec. 3 at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) meeting. But that has
been on the books since Curiosity actually landed on Mars and does not
coincide with a major announcement. 

"Curiosity's mission is producing a unprecedented volume of valuable
science data," Grotzinger told Mashable. Much of this will help us
better glimpse the very ancient environments of Mars, that are regarded
to have been the most habitable in the planet's history. We have only
just started on this journey back in time." 

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory will display Curiosity's latest
progress and observations at the AGU conference in San Francisco. 

_______________________________________________

Please be sure to include a URL to the article. Reply to the sender with a 
"Thank you" if you like this post.
_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to