On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/05/12 23:10, Brion Vibber wrote: > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Platonides <platoni...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I don't think it should contain all campaign parameters as a single tag, > >> as parameters. > >> Specially evil is the licensesOwnWork="cc-by-sa-3.0|cc-by-3.0|cc-zero". > >> > > > > The data's stored as a bunch of simple key-value pairs, including that > > pipe-separated list. > > That's horrible! If it went to store it that way, at least it should > have provided an accessor which translated it into an array. > That it does; with some tweaking I can make it output nicely as an array for both JSON and XML too. But beyond that, there's not much structure to the UploadWizardCampaign class's configuration array. -- brion > When the extension is the only consumer, we have some flexibility for > later fixing the interface. If there third-party apps are reading from > such API, it gets set in stone and we can no longer fix it. > I'd at least provide a sane interface through the api. It's not so > urgent to fix the extension, but it should eventually be done, too. > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >
_______________________________________________ Mediawiki-api mailing list Mediawiki-api@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-api
