Prtksxna has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/201117
Change subject: content: Fix typo in unredacted story
......................................................................
content: Fix typo in unredacted story
Change-Id: I290a2e5e5878126118d0b6d8c942bf531efa91ab
---
M locales/en.yml
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull
ssh://gerrit.wikimedia.org:29418/wikimedia/TransparencyReport-private
refs/changes/17/201117/1
diff --git a/locales/en.yml b/locales/en.yml
index 39d92cd..db09e31 100644
--- a/locales/en.yml
+++ b/locales/en.yml
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
story3_body: "A Tasmanian aboriginal language center demanded the removal
of the <a href='//en.wikipedia.org'>English Wikipedia</a> <a
href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palawa_kani'>article on 'palawa kani'</a>,
claiming copyright over the entirety of the language. We refused to remove the
article because copyright law simply cannot be used to stop people from using
an entire language or to prevent general discussion about the language. Such a
broad claim would have chilled free speech and negatively impacted research,
education, and public discourse—activities that Wikimedia serves to promote."
story_myanmar_title: "Unredacted<br><small>August 2014</small>"
- story_myanmar_body: "When a blogger included a photo of his visa to visit
<a href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burma#Etymology'>Burma/Myanmar</a> on his
website, he had scrubbed his personal details from the image. He never expected
the same picture to show up on <a
href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page'>English Wikipedia</a> in an article
about the country's visa policy -- with the redactions removed and his
information exposed. He wrote to the us, asking to remove the photo. Given the
nature of the information and the circumstances of how it was exposed, we took
the image down."
+ story_myanmar_body: "When a blogger included a photo of his visa to visit
<a href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burma#Etymology'>Burma/Myanmar</a> on his
website, he had scrubbed his personal details from the image. He never expected
the same picture to show up on <a
href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page'>English Wikipedia</a> in an article
about the country's visa policy -- with the redactions removed and his
information exposed. He wrote to us, asking to remove the photo. Given the
nature of the information and the circumstances of how it was exposed, we took
the image down."
story_coffee_title: "Grounds for Removal<br><small>July 2014</small>"
story_coffee_body: "A nutritional supplement company requested the removal
of all references to the term “coffee berries” from the <a
href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page'>English Wikipedia</a> article on <a
href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee'>coffee</a>, claiming both inaccuracy and
infringement of their trademark, COFFEEBERRY®. We responded that the
community of editors felt that “coffee berry” was an acceptable term to refer
to the fruit of the <a href='//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffea'>coffee plant</a>.
We also explained that trademarking a pre-existing word cannot prevent others
from using the word for its original meaning. Trademark rights simply don’t
give companies total control over everyday words."
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/201117
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: I290a2e5e5878126118d0b6d8c942bf531efa91ab
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: wikimedia/TransparencyReport-private
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Prtksxna <psax...@wikimedia.org>
_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-commits mailing list
MediaWiki-commits@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-commits
