On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Antoine Musso <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 10/04/2014 23:11, Dan Garry a écrit : > <snip> > > As a team, we have responsibilities. For example, that task that's on > > there right now is a problem caused by our actions; we pulled that > > extension for security reasons, then decided we couldn't reenable it due > > to design issues. Therefore our actions have caused a very real > > regression in our user experience. As the product manager, I find these > > regressions concerning, and we have a responsibility to fix them. > > In this specific case, if the security is solved we can probably > reenable it despite its design issue unless that causes performances or > more security issues (or maybe it is flawed by design). > I disagree: that extension shouldn't have been enabled in the first place. Drastically rearranging [[Special:Watchlist]] and [[Special:RecentChanges]] for everyone based on three people responding to a poll seems insufficient consensus to me. And given the followup conversation at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Babel/Archives/2013-10#Enable_CleanChangesafter it was enabled, there should probably be a new, well-advertised discussion before re-enabling it. -- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Software Engineer Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ MediaWiki-Core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-core
