sounds interesting. What is an "Optimized SemanticMediaWiki"?

There's a "query optimizer" patch that
a) makes identical subqueries to be executed only once (for example, in <q>a OR b</q> <q>c OR d <q>a OR b</q></q> the «a OR b» part will be executed once) b) and makes identical terms to be removed from conjunctions/disjunctions («a AND a», «a OR a» == just a).

There also exist other patches (copy-paste from wiki.4intra.net page):

* Conjunction-of-disjunctions execution bug fixed: in the original SMW, «(a OR b) AND (c OR d)» query was not executed at all! (test case: {{#ask: <q>[[A::B]] OR [[C::D]]</q> <q>[[E::F]] OR [[G::H]]</q> | format=debug }}). Patch sent to github: https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/pull/19 * Negation operator support: syntax is {{#ask: [[prop::val]] !<q>...subquery...</q> }} or just {{#ask: [[prop::val]] ![[prop2::val2]] }}. Patch sent to github: https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/pull/20 * Disable forced type-named properties: in the original SMW, data type aliases also have an unpleasant side-effect: if a property name matches the alias of some data type (for example «Telephone number») — the property will have that data type forced and you cannot override it. Patch sent to github: https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/pull/21 * Automatic refresh of all pages with semantic queries on any property update — in the original SMW you have to manually refresh it every time. Of course this can lead to frequent cache flushes — even the queries that don’t use the updated property are flushed — but at least the user always gets correct query results.

And also there are read permission checks implemented in {{#ask}} results.

Nice to see that Wiki4Intra now includes SMW! I'm also curious about
your semantic optimizations, it seems that the list is here:
http://wiki.4intra.net/SemanticMediaWiki . What do you think about
proposing them to SMW upstream?

I've posted some pull requests on github (#19, #20, #21), #21 is the simplest of them ("disable forced type-named properties") :) but there are some concerns: 1) As usual with MediaWiki, code review seems a hard and long process to me, i.e. it's definitely possible, but it takes a lot of time and makes me upset, so I don't feel too much desire of doing it :( 2) It seems SMW got some big refactoring with DI/IoC stuff everywhere in 1.9/master (for unit tests bla-bla-bla...), so the patches should be also refactored before being submitted... 3) Automatic refresh works, but in fact it's more of a quick fix than a properly designed feature, so I think I won't even submit it...

--
With best regards,
  Vitaliy Filippov

_______________________________________________
Mediawiki-enterprise mailing list
Mediawiki-enterprise@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-enterprise

Reply via email to