I agree with Cindy.  I think a "new" status showing DCDU would be
useful.  The order disappearing with a cancel would seem to be a lot
more work.  Autoverifying of the order seems just plain dangerous.  Just
my 2 cents.

Jeff Thompson
Newman Regional Health

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [SPAM] [MEDITECH-L] C/S 5.5.2 PHA Unverified Orders

Wow - I always "assumed" that unverified orders did not appear on
dispensing machine profiles until they were verified. Now I want to
check those profiles
as well. We never had unverified orders being entered until recently and
we have some night techs entering unverified orders. Now I am really
curious to see
what is happening. I don't think either the old way or the "new way" is
quite right.
Currently, if a patient is discharged, all his verified orders are DC'd
- correct? And you are saying that  the way it used to be is that if you
had an
unverified order entered and a patient was discharged before it was
verified, the order was then canceled. In that case, if an order was
pulled from a
machine on override without a verified order, you would have the
override debit to note that the med was pulled, but you would still have
to go back and
"find" the matching order in the chart to verify that the med was pulled
against a real order.  With your update, UNVERIFIED orders are
AUTO-verified when
the patient is discharged, and then , I am guessing, they should be DC'd
right after and they would have no debit or dispense associated to them.
If the
nurse pulled the med before the order was verified, there would still be
an override order - correct. With the updated version, there would be an
unverified
order which was autoverified and DC'd, so I guess that would help with
"matching" the over-ride against an order. But the order would
technically still be
unverified by a pharmacist and the written copy would still have to be
pulled from the chart.
              This is what I think "should" happen - although I know it
probably won't happen this way.
If an order is entered as Unveriified and the patient is discharged
before the order is verified, the Unverified order should be DC'dU (DC'd
as unverfied)
That way, if an over-ride is pulled against a written order, you can
match the over-ride pull against the unverified order and then see if
the pharmacist
was just way behind in verification or whatever on that day.
If the unverified order is CANCELED - it disappears and there is no
record of even an attempt to enter the order being done. On the other
hand, if the
Unverified order is auto-verified by the system and then DC'd, it gives
an initial picture of the order having been verified by "someone", thus
if the
unverified order was entered incorrectly and then auto-verified, but the
med was pulled on override just prior to the discharge, it could appear
as though
the wrong dose/med
was pulled on over-ride  ( or the other way around).
It just doesn't seem quite right the way it is currently programmed.
thanks cindy



This e-mail message, including its attachments, is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or privileged
information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


 

             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

             Sent by: [email protected]

 
To 
 
"'Allan Townsend'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[email protected]>          
             04/30/2007 01:48 PM
cc 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
Subject 
                             Please respond to
RE: [SPAM] [MEDITECH-L] C/S 5.5.2 PHA Unverified Orders

                          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 





Hey David/Allen-
My knee jerk response is most likely the same as many others - why are
UNV
orders sitting in the queue that long?  But besides that, I think the
catch
for me is...have the meds been dispensed and/or possibly administered?
Are
these UNV orders entered by Pharm Techs or do you use POM?  For patient
safety, I believe most site DO NOT have UNV orders cross to the eMAR or
a
dispensing cabinet - so that should leave the possible "floor stock" or
an
override from the cabinet as a choice for nursing to get the med in the
first place.

I am certainly not defending MT, but my understanding was the use of
auto-verify has to do with billing...a CAN order goes no where.  I don't
like it either, but I think as you roll with the update and the changed
functionality (that goes for any app with any update/new release) we are
forced to re-assess our current workflow and it lends toward the
opportunity
for some process re-design.

Best of luck - Kevin.



Kevin McConnell, PharmD.
Clinical Consultant
(713)480-6810
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.RPhInformatics.com



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Allan Townsend
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SPAM] [MEDITECH-L] C/S 5.5.2 PHA Unverified Orders

Hello; a posting on behalf of our PHA specialist

We recently took a service release and jumped from 5.3.6 to 5.5.2.
After
the update we discovered that unverified orders were no longer being
treated the same way in the Pharmacy module.  Previously, if an
unverified
ordered was on a patient profile and the patient was discharged before
the
order was verified, the order would be cancelled.  With the new release,
the order is now auto-verified by the system.  We perceive this as quite
dangerous.  Have any other sites had experience in dealing with this
issue.

David Evans
HITS-NS
Pharmacy Application Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l


=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

Reply via email to