Hi architects,

While this is an ancient e-mail, I was browsing the MeeGo 1.3
dependancy tree for a random tablet ia32 image the other day using
Agile Browser[1] and realized that it's a horrible mess of groups
these days, not at all corresponding to our Domain views as defined in
https://meego.com/developers/meego-architecture/meego-architecture-domain-view.

So, my question is if there's interest in:

* To have the MeeGo stack grouping into these domains (excluding reference UX)
* Have patches/SR's towards MeeGo 1.3 packages changing Group: tags
for them to match domain view, as it looks like the voluntary call
didn't work

If so, two questions:

* Is it your opinion that a domain covers all packages a source
package generates, or is it per .rpm?
* Would you like a overview of intended package changes before I start
sending SR's?

I think this should make the MeeGo architecture easier to work with
and browse, for many, including architects. If OK'ed, I plan to start
the work in 1 1/2 weeks.

BR
Carsten Munk
[1] http://wiki.meego.com/AgileBrowser ,
https://gitorious.org/meego-architecture/meego-deps-gen - fantastic
tool by the way.

2010/12/21  <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago it was discussed the RPM .spec file Group:
> tag is used to identify into which subsystem [1] the
> package belongs.
>
> This is an action request to all package maintainers
> to check your .spec file and label your Core OS packages.
>
> Attached (I hope a .csv file gets through) is a proposal
> about packages vs. subsystem mapping. Check your packages
> from that list. Guidelines how to label them are given in [2].
>
> [1] 
> http://meego.com/developers/meego-architecture/meego-architecture-domain-view
> [2] 
> http://wiki.meego.com/Packaging/Guidelines#Domain.2FSubsystem_based_RPM_Groups
>
> --
> Regards, Mikko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-packaging mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
>
>
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-architecture mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-architecture

Reply via email to