Thanks Austin, rpm -qa | while read rpm; do rpm -q --changelog $rpm | grep suse.de > /dev/null && echo $rpm; done I got 157:112:19 (fedora:intel:suse)
I do NOT think fedora's gcc and yum is good enough also, but provide both yum and zypper is not a good choice. 在 2010-04-06二的 14:45 +0800,Zhang, Austin写道: > By your point, what is “correct information” exactly? > > The below script and the number are really NOTHING. > > > > Those ‘redhat.com’ are saying ‘MeeGo is derived from fedora’? I did NOT say that. > You can also get some ‘suse.de’ or likewise in some other pkgs. Like > had said, we borrowed some working from other good distro and I > thought it would happen in the future also, That's just what I want, smart choice. > but that doesn’t mean MeeGo is one baby of fedora. If you see those > changelog more detail, you can also see MeeGo’s patches working for > many pkgs, sure, I see MeeGo's patches in every rpms I have ever checked, great works-:) > and in the future, if those patches were accepted into upstream, you > would not see them in repo/rpm pkgs. yes, less patch is better. > > > > Specific for the glibc, we would like to let you know we don’t invent > a wheel and initially get some good working from fedora and now are > updating and syncing with x86 optimization branch (for x86 port) of > glibc upstream. yes, good job, I want it, do you have any benchmark data? Intel is the master of X86, I think Intel can do this best. fedora guys maybe have the same idea-:), but suse and ubuntu do NOT think so. > > > > As to what you said ‘correct information’, if you are talking > something like ‘process’, please don’t hijack this thread. The > original topic of this thread is about how to get a right development > environment for meego development and “in some degree” is resolved or > filed bug on this. Please please don’t try to ‘prove’ it again as: > MeeGO comes from XXX. I just show the number I interest, I do NOT want to misleading or hijack someone-:( I use fedora, and everything is OK, so I just let others know it, > > > > > From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] > On Behalf Of An Yang > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 1:59 PM > To: Arjan van de Ven > Cc: meego-dev@meego.com > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Building the Meego Dev Environment > > > > > > Hi, Arjan, > > Everybody could got the correct information from the meego's released > rpms. > > rpm -qa | while read rpm; do rpm -q --changelog $rpm | grep redhat.com > > /dev/null && echo $rpm; done > or > rpm -qa | while read rpm; do rpm -q --changelog $rpm | grep redhat.com > > /dev/null || echo $rpm; done > > I got 157 vs 131. > > BTW, only fedora 13 use glibc 2.11.90, opensuse factory use 2.11.1, > ubuntu 10.04 use eglibc 2.11.1. > You are the maintainer of glibc, you should know it. > > If you think you have the correct information, please share with us, I > hope Intel not only open the sourcecode, but open the process, this is > the spirit of opensource, every distributor should know it. > > opensource is so amazing, nobody could spread the misinfomation. > > 在 2010-04-02五的 10:18 -0700,Arjan van de Ven写道: > > > > On 4/1/2010 20:56, An Yang wrote: > > There are 287 rpm packages in day one release, most of them come from > > Fedora 13, so I think fedora 13 is the prefer DEV ENV. > > I'm sorry but MeeGo does not come Fedora... > Please don't spread this misinformation any further... > > > > >
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev