Em Terça-feira 22 Junho 2010, às 17:04:41, Arjan van de Ven escreveu: > On 6/22/2010 7:45 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote: > > On 22/06/10 15:22, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> "Normal" applications are expected to just use the Qt Multimedia APIs to > >> play media, and not talk to gstreamer directly. > >> However, at the same time we realize that specialist type of > >> applications may want to have more finegrained and detailed control than > >> the Qt Multimedia API allows (which is somewhat of an abstraction after > >> all), so we have > >> to allow direct access to gstreamer as well, to not make really > >> interesting applications impossible. > > > > Which kind of opens the whole question of what is the point providing an > > extra abstraction on the top of the GStreamer abstraction in the first > > place, does it not ? > > No it doesn't; if all you want to do is play some movie or sound, the Qt > Mobility is more than plenty. > if you want to write a super advanced video editing application, maybe > you want a deeper level of control.
Not to mention that GStreamer isn't common in other platforms than Linux.
You may not care about them, and MeeGo also probably doesn't, but Qt does.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
