On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Wichmann, Mats D <mats.d.wichm...@intel.com> wrote: > Warren Baird wrote: >> Lines 60-62 seem to disallow the possibility of producing apps using >> byte-code compiled languages like java or C# - is that intentional? > > No, indeed the fuzzy wording at the end is supposed to allow that: > > "or any other supported language format." > > (an early reviewer objected to calling out bytecode, at least > partly because the languages you mention aren't in the current > required stack) > >
If that's the intent, I think you need to restructure the paragraph - I read the "or any other supported language format" as modifing 'scripts written in one of the interpreted programming languages listed in this specificiation" --- i.e. allowing other scripting languages. If I understand your intent correctly, it sounds like you could just remove 60-62. Are you saying it should be read as "Object files, scripts, or anything else"? Doesn't really narrow it down much, does it? Warren -- Warren Baird - Photographer and Digital Artist http://www.synergisticimages.ca _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
