> To be very blunt... Firefox isn't nearly as good a browser as Chrome or
> Chromium.....
That is the first time I've heard that. From everywhere I've read and
talked to and experienced, Chrome is less secure and less powerful.
Besides, Firefox Mobile (Fennec) is now available for Maego and Android.
http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2010/10/07/firefox-4-beta-for-android-and-maemo/
Someone at MeeGo should ask the Mozilla team that they should target
MeeGo, not just Maego.
Anyway, it seems the main problem here is that the Google Chrome
legal/marketing team is being unreasonably difficult for a platform
branding. The MeeGo legal/marketing team should not let random packages
redefine their platform. Why does Chrome merit this, unlike all other
packages in the system? Dump them, because of this additional
complications. If Chrome team feels MeeGo is a viable platform, they
should remove these obstacles. How many components of the platform are
going to cause this kind of problem until you demand this kind of
nonsense to end?
Besides, pushing Chrome up front so much kind of makes MeeGo feel like a
Chromium-wannabe, further confusing it's current image.
My $.02. :-)
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
