> while this might be a nice cleanup (minus the line wrap damage), it > really does not belong in this patch, and really should be separate > (and upstream); mixing this sort of cosmetic/cleanup with real code is > really a disaster for us.
Sorry. Shall submit a separate patch for this clean up. >> +fs_initcall(thermal_init); > this might need justification... If it were, subsys_initcall, the thermal framework was loading later than the netlink modules. So, instead of making netlink load earlier I thought of delaying the framework's loading. Hence I used fs_initcall. If there is/are any better approach(es) for this issue, I would be more than happy to know. Thanks, Durgadoss _______________________________________________ Meego-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
