Arjan van de Ven had written, on 10/22/2010 04:08 PM, the following:
On 10/22/2010 1:42 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Greg KH had written, on 10/22/2010 11:48 AM, the following:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:23:49AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
It would be great if Greg, Alan or Arjan could do a quick technical
review
just to catch any possible typos in the technical instructions.
Looking back at the wiki, we probably need to add more stuff to it -
examples of how not to post patches, contents should not contain
mixed up changes etc.. dunno exactly how we'd go about it, but I
guess we'd all need some help sometime :)
All of this information is already included in the kernel Documentation/
directory, why duplicate it again?
Look at Documentation/SubmittingPatches for all of what you need. Is
there anything in that file that does not cover what you are trying to
express here?
Arrgh.. finally some time to reply.
I can add that corporations are funny beasts. I basically made a
powerpoint version of SubmittingPatches for training engineers here...
... not that it seemed to have helped much based on what goes to this
mailing list ;-(
In the same spirit, Full Disclosure :) : Yep, given the amount $$$$ we
spend to specifically train our engineers with focused programs etc, [1]
still has exceptions floating around, but we are getting mature as a
community over time, evolving our own process, my 2 cents: lets just
facilitate this evolution and encourage more developers(outside
corporation boundaries as well) to join in. :)
Ref:
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
_______________________________________________
Meego-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
