On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:12:01PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 10/27/2010 8:24 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:48:31PM +0800, Li, Jiebing wrote: >>> > From 7f7df6e39160e0c5ff7e186b74df108b4db67569 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: JiebingLi<[email protected]> >>> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:42:43 +0800 >>> Subject: [PATCH] usb gadget: add support for medfield composite gadget >>> >>> For Medfield platform, number of endpoints is not enough to support >>> all the functions in this composite gadget. This patch ensures the >>> enabled functions will not be impacted by the failing case. >>> >>> Change-Id: Ib423c2545677ca575e05da0eb720e53ae4b455ab >> Again, will someone please explain to me exactly what this "Change-Id:" >> stuff is? > > very good question, I'm curious too.. and will start stripping these out > for now.
Why not just reject the whole thing as they are not part of an acceptable patch? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Meego-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
