On 11/17/2010 7:16 AM, Yuan, Hang wrote:
Hi Arjan,

Yes, one old version of eMMC Dekker Algorithm patch broke N900. Later we fixed 
the issue and verified on N900. During integration testing with SCU FW, some 
new issues happened. So the patch is delayed on community submission until no 
new issue reported

you're not exactly giving me confidence in your code with this.
how confident are you that you got the issues this time? i'm not.


  We will fix Greg's comments and submit new version to community soon.

But looks like eMMC community is not very active. For example, our eMMC 
hardware reset patch doesn't get community response yet after the submission 3 
weeks ago. We met the same situation on eMMC Trim and enhanced area support 
patches. Could you give us any guideline on this kind of situation? Shall we 
continue to wait for community's feedback? Or can we submit to MeeGo when no 
response in community?

maybe you need to introduce your patches better?
sometimes people ignore patches from people that they don't understand because not enough introduction has been given...

also.. you can always CC lkml on your email to make sure you get a wider audience.

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel

Reply via email to