On 3/25/2011 6:08 PM, Lu Guanqun wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:03:36PM +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 3/24/2011 5:43 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
This patch doesn't apply to your tree cleanly because there are some
lines add by Arjan's patch tree. Should this patch better go to
Arjan's patch tree?
Grumble.. can someone send me what is extra in Arjan's tree so we can
get this back straight and aligned.
actually the code in my tree was a bad hack put in place until the real
code went into your tree
I would not want that code in your tree at all....
Hi Arjan,
I've developed the new one according to Alan's suggestion (requesting a
gpio line, set the direction, and free it when it's unloaded.).
Would you please help to review this patch? Is it still a 'bad hack' in
your point of view?
yes it's still a bad hack since the firmware exposes the actual GPIO
number in the SFI table..
... and your patch STILL hardcodes it.
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-kernel
