I'm happy that I found the problem, but extremely embarassed at my mistake and how long it took me to find it.
I mistakenly used index of refraction data in place of permittivity data. Maybe I should consider a career in the aerospace industry. Thanks again for your help. Best Regards, Matt On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, matt wrote: > > > That's not it. I set the resolution early in the script, and I'm able > to confirm via h5ls that increasing the resolution in the script > increases the size of problem. > > Best, > Matt > >> The problem turned out to be that they were calling (set! resolution ...) >> too late in the file. When you call add-flux to add a flux plane the >> fields are initialized and the resolution etc. is set; changing the >> resolution etc. after that point has no effect (unless you call >> reset-meep! or similar). Perhaps your problem is similar? >> > > _______________________________________________ > meep-discuss mailing list > meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu > http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss > _______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
