Hi John Please have a look at the attachment. I have two different duplications and the defects are in the duplications. If I re-run I get the same defects at the same positions. Is this the problem you are facing? I have plotted with pyplot and also with Mathematica, no difference at all. I have also tried with "mp.at_beginning(mp.output_epsilon)" but changes.
G On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 00:45, John Weiner <johwei...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Galaa, > > I’ve seen similar things, large isolated, unphysical excursions in > otherwise perfectly reasonable results when plotting data from a meep > output. Are you using Matplotlib/pyplot for your plotting routines? And > do the excursions appear at exactly the same points and with the same > amplitudes reproducibly or do they vary unpredictably? I would be quite > interested to know if anyone has a good explanation and a good fix. > > Best regards, > > John > > > On May 28, 2019, at 17:33, Galaa Badrakh <galaa.cod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi All. > > > > I am new to MEEP and trying to use the "geometric_objects_duplicates" > feature. After simulation complete, I extracted the dielectric spatial > profile with "data=sim.get_array(center=mp.Vector3(), > size=mp.Vector3(0.0,0.0,height), component=mp.Dielectric)" to double check > my geometry but I see unexpected lines at some interfacing points, have a > look at attached picture. Is this the artifact of subpixel smoothing? If > so, how to avoid this artifact? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > G > > <structure.png>_______________________________________________ > > meep-discuss mailing list > > meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu > > http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss
