On 11/08/2014 2:45 PM, Oliver Nagy wrote:
Hi Mike,
I do not seem to be able to post to the list, so here is a private
reply.
I believe you want the Mozilla Public License. It is similar in
spirit to the LGPL but allows your code to be freely mixed with other
(proprietary) code.
You can find the license here https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/
A useful explanation is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Public_License.
And a brief discussion about the differences between LGPL and MPL is
here:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/221365/mozilla-public-license-mpl-2-0-vs-lesser-gnu-general-public-license-lgpl-3-0
It certainly seems more permissive from a technical perspective.
However, not being compiled software, I can't see much effective
difference between the two licenses with respect to dynamic and static
linking.
The advice which seems worth thinking about the most is whether the Free
Software Foundation or the Mozilla Foundation will help if their license
is breached.
Not sure there - although I am aware of FSF efforts in Europe.
Thanks Oli
Mike
Good luck!
Best, Oli
_______________________________________________
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
