On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 at 12:39 Tennessee Leeuwenburg <tleeuwenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I personally don't believe that list settings really fulfil the goal of > providing information security to emails. I think people are responsible > for checking their own correspondence. This is a public forum, and its main > purpose to provide a social forum for people to interact in. I agree that > hitting 'reply all' is a common failure mode, but I would rather optimise > for the common usage case. > It isn't "Reply All" that has this problem - that is suppose to go to everyone. It is "Reply" that has this problem. With reply-to set, the only way to get a private reply with many clients is to manually copy and paste the senders address.
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list melbourne-pug@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
