On 5 April 2013 13:43, Nick <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 06:12 +1000, Kai Willadsen wrote: >> On 5 April 2013 00:06, Nick <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Meld is currently working for me exactly as I want it, so such an option >> > isn't needed by me. But if it were pursued, I ask that the current >> > capability be preserved. >> >> By 'current capability' I assume you mean the ability to have a list >> of encodings to try? > > Not necessarily. I mean the feature of being able to display files w/ > different encodings w/out me having to manually select/specify them for > each file. Whether that be the current form where multiple encodings > are specified, or an auto-detect method, or something else works for me. > Auto-detect seems like it will produce false positives and/or false > negatives in some situations, so having some way to force it to behave > as expected seems like a good idea.
Right. With auto-detect, there would have to be an override. Whether that's a drop-down in the open-file dialog or in the 'whoops, we couldn't open this file' infobox, or something else... I don't know. cheers, Kai _______________________________________________ meld-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/meld-list
