I think in this case he actually didn't have the hide button as it
turns out...
a side effect of the way temporary users and handled in this version
(ie a bug)
Nonetheless:
1) agree
2) I think we decided hide was more in line with what it does
3) probably wouldn't hurt, but shouldn't distract from readability
I think we might want to revisit adding some form of X icon on that
button though... I'm thinking for users that don't speak english, an
image of the word "hide" isn't going to do do much since it can't be
translated.
- Luke
On Mar 16, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Randall Leeds wrote:
Here's another feedback from someone who doesn't understand how Hide
works.
1) Screencast still a great idea
2) Have we tossed out the word 'Dismiss' as a possibility yet?
3) Maybe it's not the word 'Hide' but the prominence of the button
itself. Can/should we make it stand out more?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:07
Subject: [melkjug.org feedback] melkjug.org Instance
To: [email protected]
== Melkjug Feedback from Anonymous[cintra] ([email protected]) ==
As I scroll past feed posts I expect them to be marked as read, like
in Google Reader. That isn't happening and I don't see where to
indicate I've finished with a post..
