Mark. I could maybee se a problem with having one per two cylinders. if one decides to shit itself one half of the engine would get totally different air fuel ratios and maybee the whole thing going bang big time. Like half of the engine would like kinda stall and the other half would be fueled and boosted up big time so the half with the dead turbo would probably lean out?? I recon one turbo is enough of a worry with out adding another to the equasion. But two spooling up to ten psi would happen quicker with only half the induction needed so you would be really getting like maybee 18maybee psi in real terms? Just my thinking really. maybee I am way off track here. dunno. Later mate. Rick White.
--- "mark krawczuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >hi, if you have a single turbo at 10 psi, feeding 4 cyls, would it go >better/or what would happen if you have two turbos at 10 psi, with each >turbo feeding 2 cyls? > > i was fairly ,sorta on the track explaining to my bro, but then he said >amongst other stuff, that he cant see any reason why two are better than >one..... > > mark k > _____________________________________________________________ Get Your free Ozdat Email Account ---> http://www.ozdat.com _____________________________________________________________ Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with [EMAIL PROTECTED] by Everyone.net http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
