That sounds more complex than simply dumping a copy of what's in memory to disk and restoring it five minutes later when the system is restarted. If I understand correctly, memcached doesn't offer replication so I'd have to somehow make it do so myself - right?
On Sep 9, 7:24 pm, Joseph Engo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could have a secondary memcache pool that you warm up during > maintenance periods, then switch over temporarily (using a load > balancer). > > On Sep 9, 2008, at 6:04 PM, PlumbersStock.com wrote: > > > > > Is there any technical reason that memcache shouldn't dump it's db to > > disk when shutdown and restore it when started again? If save/restore > > were options I could rewrite my start/stop scripts to do it - those > > who didn't want it wouldn't have to have it. > > > This would be a handy option for me as it takes me hours to rebuild > > after a system shutdown. My backend system is proprietary and slow > > which is the main reason for caching everything in memcached in the > > first place. I was caching everything in a MySQL db before but > > memcached is quite a bit faster and less intensive on my server.