On Nov 20, 6:02 pm, "Toru Maesaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry it took this long to reply... anyway this is soooo awesome!! > thanks Dustin. > > From glancing through that tree, there are several commits that > shouldn't be credited to me. This happened when I brought over the > patches from the stable tree to the binary tree. Here is the hash list > and the author that should be credited: > > a4ccd0105294cf4ea7200b46e88bcaa2e81769d7 (Dormando) > 2bb81e14df2a90e90c688fc8ddfafbd388c5410e (Dormando) > 3a34c127153acb2928c2c873558f842d465a2b18 (Brian Aker) > 1a9672f5fa6672cc15e5e1920f7dfcc944b755e9 (Brian Aker) > ac9397d254f0c8204f73d4886b41f3bbfeda23af (Ricky Zhou) > 2aeae00b8851dce33d5da1d4dd503669fb4ccb10 (Dormando) > de9106786b650304545f275dc25cc1fb9ff8c156 (Facebook + Dormando) > 931ed256e0505b28a40a22caace220b3c4bdf419 (Facebook + Dormando)
Great, thanks a lot. I applied these (the last two are listed as Dormando unless he or someone else has other author information) this morning and pushed out a new tree (rewritten, so all the hashes are invalid again). I also realized I had ended up with a couple of Trond's again, so I fixed those. I think this tree's in pretty good shape, but it's fairly isolated. Once enough people think this is an accurate representation of the project, I think it would be good to get more development moved over to this tree. Does anyone have any concerns about doing this?
